Following on from our earlier announcement, we wanted to go into a bit more detail about the goals of the Registries of Good Practice project, some of the principles that will guide us, and how to get involved.
Goals
At a high-level, the goal is to help the whole digital preservation community get more out of the registries and records we have, in order to move the practice of digital preservation forward. It’s not clear exactly how to achieve this, so the initial focus will be on working with the community to explore three interrelated issues…
Firstly, what is the current ‘landscape’ of active and openly-accessible registries of things like format, software, tools and workflows, and how are they being used in practice? How do vendors integrate and use them? How does that compare with what practitioners do with them, and how registry maintainers build them? What works well? What’s not so good? How could things be improved?
Secondly, how do practitioners work towards ‘good practice’, and could ‘registries of practice’ help? What methods do people use to improve their practices? How do we build on the work of others, and avoid reinventing the wheel? What are the good sources of information about practical digital preservation? How useful are the iPres proceedings in this regard? How can we improve the discoverability of these kinds of resources?
Finally, what are the common practices used to build and maintain technical registries themselves? What are the constraints we’re operating under? How does that affect the kind of approaches we can take? What kinds of contributions are welcome, and through which channels?
The hope is that, by the end of the project, we will all share a broader and richer understanding of these issues, and that we will have developed useful tools and systems to help us improve our practices and maintain our registries.
Principles
While it’s not yet clear what the outputs of this project will be, we feel it’s important to establish some of the principles that we will use to guide our work. This isn’t an exhaustive list, and these rules may need to be refined over time. But we’ve seen a lot of registry projects come and go, and this is our attempt to articulate what we’ve learned from that, and how that will shape our work.
No New Registries
We’ve been involved in digital preservation for a long time, and have seen a lot of short-term project funding spent on grand visions of what preservation registries could be. While those research projects have been very valuable in helping us understand what might be possible, very few have successfully made the transition from prototype to production. We believe most of these projects underestimated the barriers to adoption, the effort required to fill these registries, and the difficulties involved in managing data over time (especially around maintaining parallel ‘forks’ of curated datasets).
This project is not about ‘owning’ or ‘solving’ the registry problem. Maintaining registries of technical information is difficult work and requires a commitment of time and skills that are in short supply across our sector. It is very important to us that whatever we do will respectfully highlight the long-term and ongoing efforts that people and organisations have put into the registries we all depend on.
Empower Others
This project will deliver one full-time person of effort over two short years, so how do we maximise the long-term returns from this brief pulse of funding? We believe that, rather than replicating the kind of work that is already being done, it will be better for everyone if we find ways of contributing that help empower the existing communities in and around preservation registries. Therefore, we will start by building a deeper understanding of ‘the registries problem’ from a practical point of view, and look for ways to help.
Can we build tools that will help registry maintainers work more quickly and confidently? Can we provide resources that will help grow the community of people who use and contribute to registries? Can we make it easier to learn from the past and avoid common pitfalls or reinvented wheels? How can we be a force-multiplier for good practice?
Be Realistic
While we want to be ambitious and try new things, we also have to be realistic about the limitations of this project: it’s one full-time equivalent person for two years. We believe we can make a significant contribution to the practice of digital preservation, but this will require clarity of purpose and focussed prioritisation.
Similarly, we understand there are many pressures and complicating factors that mean the teams running our registries are already overstretched. We will aim to support those teams, and to avoid encouraging unreasonable demands or expectations.
Be Useful
This might sound obvious, but over the years there have been a lot of “if you build it they will come” digital preservation projects that foundered because practitioners were unable to integrate those products into their work. Whatever we build must be driven by genuine user need and must work with or around the practical barriers that practitioners, registry maintainers and vendors face.
This is where wider community feedback is critically important. We can’t tell if we’re succeeding unless you let us know whether what we’re doing is actually useful!
Iterate Early, Often, and in the Open
It is not clear what the shared needs and common barriers are for the digital preservation community, and safe spaces for discussion are only part of the solution. To ensure we’re on the right track, any tools or resources we develop must be rapidly and openly iterated. Broadly speaking, rather than gathering formal requirements, we will focus on generating experimental prototypes to probe the issues and provoke discussion. The biggest benefit of time-limited project funding is the opportunity to fail, and to learn from the failures.
Build on the Work of Others
There is so much great work out there, and we want to learn from it, build on it, and shout about it from the rooftops. Not just the preservation registries, but also many different resources and tools from a range of institutions and individuals. Publicising the good work of others will be critical to our success.
Our biggest fear is accidentally leaving someone out! There’s a lot going on and the person doing most of the work on this project has been heavily focussed on web archiving in recent years. Please don’t be offended if we seem to miss you out, and please don’t assume anything is obvious to us! Please get in touch!
Make it Easy to Maintain
While we hope to be able to continue at least some of this work beyond this initial two years, there are no guarantees. Therefore, it is critical that the output of the project is something that the DPC and the wider digital preservation community can maintain.
At first, while exploring and experimenting, we can relax this constraint a little, but it will always be borne in mind that the final results cannot be something that requires a lot of complex infrastructure or frequent maintenance. Quite what this means is also unclear at this point, but it’s safe to say it’s more like minimal computing and less like ChatGPT.
Next Steps
In these early weeks, the focus will be on establishing who wants to be involved and how we might work. We’ll also try to spend some time looking at some of the existing work in this area that might provide inspiration, in much the same way as the iPres 2022 “Registering our preservation intentions” workshop on digital preservation registries helped inspire this project.
We’re aware that building a meaningful and respectful engagement process that will help us all achieve our goals is quite a difficult challenge. Realistically, this is another thing that will have to iterate and evolve over time, but we thought we’d start by setting up the Preservation Registries Special Interest Group (PR-SIG) mentioned in the prior announcement.
The original idea of this group came out of the same iPres 2022 workshop, where we proposed the idea of the Digital Preservation Coalition hosting an open ‘drop-in’ meeting for anyone interested in format and software registries. We now have the resources to fulfil that promise, so we’ll start with a monthly videoconference that provides a space for that discussion. This is not intended to require any preparation or other significant commitment beyond simply attending the meetings, if you find them useful.
At first, we’ll use this space to ask questions and gather feedback on this project, exploring the factors described in the Goals section above. We’d also encourage attendees to share any updates on registries they depend on and/or maintain. Over time, we’ll see if a standing agenda emerges, and adapt the format to suit the needs of the attendees.
We’re in the process of setting up a mailing list to circulate brief project updates and share the meeting details. In the meantime, if you haven’t already been in touch to express your interest but would like to join, please get in touch with me at andrew.jackson@dpconline.org.