Styles test
Existing style example | How we'd like it to look | Change in styles required |
Heading 1 |
Heading 1 | font-size: 2.4em |
Heading 2 |
Heading 2 | font-size: 1.9em |
Heading 3 |
Heading 3 | font-size: 1.7em, remove bold |
Heading 4 |
Heading 4 | font-size: 1.5em, remove bold |
Heading 5 |
Heading 5 | font-size: 1.3em |
Heading 6 |
Heading 6 | font-size: 1.1em |
Normal Paragraph | Normal Paragraph | No change required |
hotlink not hotlink
|
hotlink not hotlink
|
The hotlinks styles are not consistent between normal paragraphs, bulletted text and text in tables. Hotlinks should be green, bold and the same size as normal paragraph text regardless of where they are. Bulleted and table hotlinks seem to be a different vertical size and omit the bold. |
HeadingParagraph of text Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Paragraph of text Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Another headingParagraph of text Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. |
The spacing between headings and paragraphs is about right, but is in the wrong place. As it stands, there is the same gap between a heading following a paragraph, as there is between a paragraph and the next heading. A heading should be half as close to following paragraph text, but anything preceeding a heading should be half again as far further away. In other words, there should be a smaller gap between a heading and a following paragraph, and a bigger gap between a paragraph and a following heading. I've tried to show this in the example column with an image, rather than trying to hack the HTML |
|
Collaborative Projects
Open Book FuturesThe Open Book Futures project (OBF), led by Lancaster University, will significantly expand key infrastructures created by COPIM to achieve a step change in how community-owned Open Access (OA) book publishing is delivered. |
|
Novice to Know-HowThe Novice to Know-How learning pathway aims to provide beginners with the skills required to develop and implement simple digital preservation workflows within their organisation and is part of The National Archives’ digital capacity building strategy, ‘Plugged In, Powered Up,’ |
|
Registries of Good PracticeThe "Registries of Good Practice" Project will explore and develop different approaches to analyze, collate, present and, most importantly, make discoverable the many existing registries and collections of digital preservation good practice. |
|
Completed ProjectsCollaborative projects that have been completed. |
Professional Development
A key role for the DPC is to empower and develop our members’ workforces. Our members operate in a competitive and dynamic knowledge environment where roles and responsibilities of staff are constantly changing. It is crucial, therefore, that staff remain informed of, trained in and confident with the new developments and tools which are released and made available. This is particularly important when existing staff are retrained to embrace a new skills set.The DPC provides training and personal development facilities to address these challenges:
Digital Preservation Competency FrameworkThe DPC Digital Preservation Competency Framework identifies and describes information on the skills, knowledge, and competencies required for successful digital preservation. |
|
Novice to Know-How online trainingThe Novice to Know-How learning pathway aims to provide beginners with the skills required to develop and implement simple digital preservation workflows within their organisation and is part of The National Archives’ digital capacity building strategy, ‘Plugged In, Powered Up,’ |
|
Career Development FundProvides support for DPC members to undertake training and personal development opportunities. These scholarships and grants are offered through regular calls for applications, but members are also welcome to nominate relevant opportunities . |
|
Getting Started and Making Progress training modulesReference materials for DPC face to face training. On-site training is available on request. |
|
DPC Reading ClubThe DPC’s Reading Club provides a forum to chat about a recent digital preservation publication with other Members in a friendly and informal group. |
|
Python Study Group ProgramThe main purpose of the BitCurator Consortium (BCC) and Digital Preservation Coalition (DPC) Python Study Group (PSG) program is to provide a regular and effective training program and community of learning focused on the development of scripting and coding skills, which can be practically and meaningfully applied to digital preservation activities and workflows. |
|
Labour Market AnalysisAs part of its strategic commitments to workforce development, the DPC undertakes studies on the digital preservation labour market, analyzing data gathered from online job advertisements. |
|
Aus Preserves Ingest and Pre-Ingest training modulesMaterials for delivering face to face training focused on a range of skills relating to various aspects of receiving, handling, and managing digital content. |
|
External training/education opportunitiesA wide range of digital preservation training and development opportunities are offered by agencies and institutions around the world. A selection of courses offered by DPC members includes:
|
Champion Digital Preservation
Bit ListThe Bit List reveals which digital materials are most at risk and which are relatively safe thanks to digital preservation. It celebrates great preservation endeavors as entries become less of a ‘concern’, and highlights the need for efforts to safeguard those still considered ‘critically endangered’. |
|
Digital Preservation AwardsThe prestigious Digital Preservation Awards is the most prominent celebration of achievement for those people and organisations who have made significant and innovative contributions to maintaining our digital legacy. |
|
World Digital Preservation DayWorld Digital Preservation Day brings together our community to celebrate digital preservation achievements and raise the profile of this work in the wider world. |
|
Engaging with Public PolicyThe DPC campaigns for digital preservation and long term access to be a feature of public policy and routinely advises Government and related agencies on issues that are relevant to our members and our mandate. We publish our responses as a commentary of public policy consultations relating to digital preservation. |
Digital Preservation
This page brings together all of the DPC's resources for supporting digital preservation activities in our Member's organizations and beyond.
If you're new to digital preservation, check out our beginners guide: What is digital preservation?
Common requirements structure for preservation system procurement
This section of the Procurement Toolkit provides a structure for describing preservation system requirements in a standardized manner.
This structure aims to simplify communication of Members requirements while providing some indication of areas that should be considered for requirements gathing/coverage. Note that this observation is important. This work does not intend to imply that a particular organisation must document requirements in all of these sections. However, consideration should be given to whether coverage in each of these areas might be appropriate for the organisation in question. It has been developed based on requirements made available by DPC Members along with comparitive validation with related work and resources, including DPC RAM and ISO16363. Note also that this Toolkit includes a set of 10 core requirements for a preservation system which could be used to begin to populate this much broader structure.
-
Acquisition, transfer and ingest
-
Content preservation
-
Bitstream preservation
-
Management and administration
-
Discovery and access
-
Systems integration and interoperability
-
System design
-
Metadata management
-
Security
-
Disaster recovery and resilience
-
Export/exit strategy
-
Training
-
Usability/help/documentation
-
Contractual
-
Supplier profile
-
Implementation
-
General/other
A more detailed list, incorporating a second level of requirement topics can be found in this downloadable document: Common Requirements Structure v2.0 .
As noted in the "Lessons learned in digital preservation procurement" section (DPC Members only), a requirements led procurement process is not the only way to proceed, and may not be the best fit for you. However, many of our members do use this approach and this area has been identified by both DPC Members and Supporters as being ripe for additional development and support from the DPC.
Licence
Note that this work is made available under a CC-BY Licence.
Further Resources for Procurement
- Piloting institutional digital preservation - experiences from the Jisc Open Research Hub pilots
- Procuring Digital Preservation: A Briefing - recorded presentations from the DPC's most recent briefing day on procurement (DPC Members only)
- 'Digital Preservation and Enterprise Architecture Collaboration at the University of Melbourne: A Meeting of Mindsets' - iPRES Conference paper
- ‘How to Talk to IT about Digital Preservation’ - Scott Prater's guide to engaging with your IT department
- DPC Handbook Procurement - checklists and issues for procurement in the DPC Handbook
- Digital Preservation Business Case Toolkit - for creating a business case prior to procurement activities
Procurement Toolkit Introduction
Foreword
The emergence of a genuine marketplace for third-party services has prompted a change in the approach that organizations take to deliver digital preservation. Only a decade ago it would have been inconceivable for core preservation activities to be fulfilled by a commercial entity on a short-term contract with closed source applications and off-site data storage. Much has changed in a decade, including the growth and maturation of commercial solutions, the emergence of a competitive marketplace and the paradigm shift towards cloud computing. As a result, many DPC Members have moved to outsource elements of their preservation activities – or at least moved towards dependence on commercially developed repository applications.
This dramatic change has brought considerable benefit. A professional digital preservation capability can now (at least in part) be bought off the shelf and implemented relatively rapidly. The growing number of third-party providers has generated a variety of effective products leading to new competition, which has stimulated growth and development.
The emergence of the commercial digital preservation marketplace also brings new challenges and risks. Mitigating these risks requires staff to gain new skills and understanding in managing outsourced work, including areas such as: renewed attention to quality checking; dedication to maintaining effective communication with third parties; and an awareness of (and preparedness for) the common problems that might occur.
Feedback from both DPC Members and Supporters suggests that procurement activities are complex, challenging and very time consuming. Members typically find slow moving procurement projects frustrating and feel unsure if these resource intensive processes will be successful in making the right procurement choices. Supporters are frustrated by the need to produce bespoke responses to long Requests for Information (RFIs), despite an obvious core set of questions that appear from one RFI to the next (albeit with different wording).
Once the procurement process itself is complete there are further challenges to navigate in the implementation phase. Both DPC Members and their suppliers will want a smooth and painless transition to a production system with effective integrations with existing systems and rigorous testing. Effective communication and clearly assigned roles and responsibilities will be required for successful implementation.
How to use this toolkit
This toolkit does not provide a guide to procurement itself, but rather aims to provide a variety of resources that will help make a procurement process more effective. A central part of the toolkit is the Lessons learned in digital preservation procurement section which describes an array of hints, tips and potential pitfalls derived from the first-hand experiences of DPC Members and Supporters. It includes generic procurement advice as well as specifics on the procurement of preservation systems, web archiving services and digitisation services. It is well worth digesting this guide before embarking upon a procurement process. There are pointers to activities that may be particularly beneficial to consider at an early stage. For example, testing is often only considered after a contract has been signed, but it might be beneficial to build a test plan at the beginning and integrate this into various procurement stages. The Common requirements structure section aims to remove redundant work from a requirements gathering process, and make the organisation and communication of requirements much more straightforward. It provides a structure into which an organization's requirements can be organized and communicated. This has been augmented with a new section in version 2 of this toolkit. The Core requirements for a digital preservation system provides a starting point for requirements gathering work, by describing the core requirements likely to be necessary in an digital preservation system. These last two sections may be of help in your procurement process, but remember that drawing up requirements should not be your starting point. The Digital preservation requirements for procuring IT systems provides a set of model requirements, and related guidance, on procuring IT systems that are unrelated to digital preservation but may hold data that will ultimately need to be preserved, such as an EDRMS, DAMS or GIS.
Future development
We’re particularly keen to continue adding lessons learned from DPC Members experiences, so please get in touch if you’ve recently completed a procurement process and would like to help out. Specific examples that we can include would be excellent, but so are broader hints and tips and any pitfalls to watch out for.
Discussions on procurement and the development of this Toolkit will continue to draw on Member feedback via our annual DP Futures and Connecting the Bits events, as well as discussion in the Good Practice Sub-Committee.
Policy Template - Document Control (recommended)
It should be clear to a reader of your policy who wrote it, when it was created and approved, when it was last updated and when it is due for review. It may also be useful to identify key checkpoints in drafting and record that key stakeholders have been involved. The inclusion of a version number may be helpful. Policy documents are typically reviewed and updated every two to five years, so it is helpful for readers to know they have the most up-to-date version. Key information about the document should be easy for the reader to find and clearly displayed.
Document control information is typically located at the start or end of a policy document and formatted as a table. There may be local preferences in your organization as to where the information is located and how it is formatted and what information should be recorded. Consider which of the following you might include:
-
Approved by.
-
Approval date.
-
Version.
-
Last amended date.
-
Written/prepared by.
-
Policy owner/sponsor.
-
Policy contact.
-
Distribution.
-
Review Date.
-
File name.
-
Availability.
-
Brief description of key changes made.
Consider the level of detail that is needed if you are recording version history and changes made. It may be useful to keep track of minor details and input from different stakeholders whilst the policy is moving towards approval and sign off, but a less detailed summary of document history may be more appropriate for the final version of your policy that you publish.
Example policy statements
Wellcome Collection Digital Preservation Policy 2019–2021 (2019) - this policy includes a clear table on the back page providing key information about the document.
Bodleian Libraries Digital Preservation Policy (2022) - this policy includes a document history section at the end which shows history of the document as it is revised and updated.
Archaeology Data Service Preservation Policy - the ADS provides a table on their web page showing preservation policy versions and dates. This allows users to easily see which is the current version but also to look back at previous versions if required.
Policy Template - Contact (optional)
It is good practice to provide contact details for queries or feedback about the policy. If your policy is intended to be a method of communicating about digital preservation with a wider audience, you may want to facilitate two way communication, and putting a point of contact on your policy is the obvious way to do this.
Note, that providing contact details can be done in many different ways, under its own heading, in the document control section or alternatively as a clear statement at the start or end of the document.
Example policy statements
Cambridge University Libraries Digital Preservation Policy (2021) - this policy very clearly provides contact details on page 1 of the policy underneath the table of contents with 'Questions about this policy?' and an email address.
Library and Archives Canada Preservation Policy Framework (2022) - under the heading 'Information' this policy includes a postal and email address for questions about the Policy Framework.
Subcategories
Collaborative Projects
Ongoing collaborative projects that the DPC is an active member of. These are typically externally funded.